Has anyone ever questioned in their own mind WHY when you go to a White Coated Assassin that they tell you that you have a 'virus' without doing a cell culture or plaque assay or even the dreaded PCR test (pre-convid) but then write a prescription for an ANTIBIOTIC that ONLY takes the cell wall off of bacteria?
A possible explanation might be an assholian attempt to reduce the population of bacteria that might be infected by phages that are TOGETHER creating the conditions that manifest as disease.
A very simple idea that I came up with years ago but NO ONE has ever addressed it on any level other than to argue the superficial points.
The average person with no experience in things biologique or bio wharf air will never take into account any AND logic only OR logic (a sign of an infantile mind) because they have been trained to accept only dialectical choices. I have posted this Cut & Paste since the convid plandemic was first constructed as an A.I. scripted social engineering project. It is based on Asymmetrical Full-Spectrum Warfare principles that have ALWAYS been used by the other side for at least 5784 years;
#1 Could it be part of the $7.3 Million Fauci spent on Gain of Function Wuhan Weapon? Yes.
#2 Could it be a complete fabrication of fear that then causes people to get medical intervention that kills them? Yes.
#3 Could it be a complete fabrication of fear that uses the fear as a cover to spray 'disinfectants' that have ALL of the same symptoms of
the supposed disease? Yes.
#4 Could it be that the vaccine is the actual disease/weapon? Yes.
#5 Could it be that the vaccine is part of a binary or tertiary weapon deliver system? Yes.
#6 Could it be that a virus or vaccine is activated by frequency such as the 5G system? Yes.
#7 Could it be graphene oxide that is in the swabs, masks, vaccines,chemtrails, etc? Yes.
#8 Could it be graphene oxide coupled with any of the other components as a binary or tertiary weapons system AND activated by frequency? Yes.
My latest meme is ALL OF THE ABOVE.
We don't know the answer to ANY of these questions so if it is bad then I just take it as true.
Give me some more background on why you say that Bacteriophages cannot be isolated from their Bacterial Hosts. Viruses by definition are FILTERABLE ORGANISMS, which means that below a certain micron level the supposed agents will pass through the filter but anything larger cannot pass. Viruses have always been able to be isolated with the only confounding factor that cellular debris and free nucleic acids can also pass the filter.
Since 2008 I have also been sharing the recipe for spontaneous generation of phages using Yeast extract, B-vitamins, Phosphorus, and Casein OUTSIDE OF A HOST CELL. This brings everyting in to the world of Royal Rife and de novo assembly from protits to bacteria to mycobacteria to fungi known as pleomorphism that I could partially confirm with a study by Stanford that has since been sanitized from the internet.
So you are saying that bacteriophage isolation from their host can be accomplished. So, it must. be deliberate that they are not being isolated when it comes to COVID-19. From what you have shared it sounds like Virus is a distraction and Bacteriophage is the pathogen that could be in a number of different types of hosts. Here is link to video telling how to isolate phages from geese and duck poop at a park. The phages connected with E. Coli can be harvested from animal poop using a 50 ML cone and a spatula. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt0miFrXMaY
Wayne.... how long did it take you to find that video?
In the age of information it takes SECONDS to have access to ANYTHING that the A.I. will now petulantly allow access to.
SECONDS.
To find what: Visual plaque assay of bacteriophage = VIRUSES WITHOUT THE USE OF AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE.
Harvesting of the plaque = REPLICATED BACTERIOPHAGES = VIRUSES that can then be
ISO-FUCKING-LATED in a 0.22 micron filter that EXCLUDES ALL BACTERIA (she had to centrifuge the supernatant twice just to get the particle size down to where it didn't plug the filter...
AND THEN SHE HAD A SOLUTION OF LYTIC (LYSATE) PHAGES THAT COULD THEN KILL THE HELL OUT OF E. COLI THAT COULD KILL PEOPLE (TOXGENIC PHAGE INFECTED E. Coli).
Phages can be Friend or Foe. Phreind/Phoe.
I've been telling this story since 2008 which is why I have conclude the entire world is under a Black Magicks Mind Control SPELL. BMMCS.
Tell me if you didn't get a chill knowing that she was filtering Goose Shit and the name of your Substack is Goose Sauce ???? !!!!!!
in the Olden Days before high tech machinery the ONLY way to deterimine phages was the Plaque Assay and then they would take that pus-like clump of VIRUSES and treat other bacteria of the same species to make sure that it KILLED THEM. Phages were used as MEDICINE until the US decided to make them into We Upons. You can't see a phage under a light microscope. But even back in the days of Looney Louey Pasture they had filters to exclude certain sized particles
Use of Membrane Filter Technique in the Microbiological Control for the ...
All yeast cells filtered were successfully retained and cultivated on a 1.2-μ membrane filter by use of a synthetic medium. All bacteria filtered avoided entrapment on a 1.2-μ membrane filter and were successfully retained and cultivated on a 0.22-μ membrane filter with the same synthetic medium.
===================================
As you can see this is why the woman in the video you linked STILL USE 0.22 micron filters to this day.
THESE ARE INDUSTRY STANDARDS SO WHEN THE MULING, BARKING, WHINING TALKING HEADS SAY THAT "NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED, AND PURIFIED..." that is only PARTIALLY TRUE. ANY SUBSTANCE THAT CAN PASS THE 0.22 micron pore size will get through: Nucleic acids and any shed particles of the bacteria and fungus and parasites that pass through those pores. But it certainly isolates them from the LARGE confunding contenders that the VDE people seem to embrace with open arms as the saviors of mankind: Fungus, Bacteria and Parasites are now the Friends of Mankind. Here to help. Kinda like the Is Ra Elis 'helping' the Pal Us Steinians.
A typical microfiltration membrane pore size range is 0.1-10 µm, with the most commonly used being 0.2 µm and 0.45 µm, which is sufficient to eliminate bacteria and fungi.
Quite often, when biological samples are processed, viruses must be removed or inactivated. Nanofilters with smaller pore sizes of 20-50 nm (nanofiltration) are used.
Some studies have shown that prions can be removed or reduced by filtration.
=========================================
Nanofilters are a newer edition to the ceramic filters of days gone by. But look at the website:
INTRODUCTORY MICROBIOLOGY !!!!
This is the basics ! yet asshats all day long will vomit clandestine-service scripted talking points like: Never Been Isolated. Never Been Purified.
Even Bernaise and Hit Leer knew that if you repeat it loud enough and long enough it will be taken as fact.
Fuck me with a stick.
I've been going over this for 16 fucking years and I'm tired of emotional idiots out of their depth of BASIC LABORATORY TECHNIQUE.
There are limits to what I know but it seems that if you wanted to reduce confounding variables like free RNA or DNA that you could use either enzymes to degrade them or antibodies to flocculate them.
Seems like there'a a lot of flocculation going on in the background.
******************************************
But do you see what has been going on since the days of D'Herelle in the 1900s.
Tests that used to rely on the EYES = plaque assay and VIRAL CULTURE were REPLACED by bullshit like PCR and 50/50 antibody assays.
ON PURPOSE.
With such USELESS tests you can MAKE the results anything you WANT them to be:
Run the PCR too few cycles = Negative.
Run the PCR too many cycles = Positive.
Run a plaque assay/cell culture and a Third Grader could read the results.
================================
If you're familiar with the series that I did with Our Lady of Sardinia on Cures that are Not Cures we had to go to the basics of DEFINING what Detoxification is and what Cure means.
You and I will have to formalize what a VIRUS is based on the accepted terminology and TAXONOMY is and separate it out from CELLULAR POISONS and insure that everyone knows that a bacteiophage is merely a VIRUS that infects bacteria.
But here's the thing that the fools that are either natural idiots or are clandestine service agents TOTALLY IGNORE:
MANY microbial agents can be husked out and the payload can be replaced by whatever the evil geniuses have concocted. This means that you can take a bacteriophage or... to make things modern and relatable:
A fucking ADENOVIRUS = THE VECTOR FOR ONE TYPE OF THE CONVEED VACK SCENES, HUSKED OUT AND FILLED IN WITH WHATEVER THEY WANTED INSIDE OF IT.
All that has to happen then is for the VEHICLE to adhere to the cell wall of the host (this time HUMANS instead of bacteria) and gain entry to the cell then offload the guts and its off to the races.
THIS IS CALLED GENE THERAPY!
Now, you are obligated to ask and the VDEs are obligated to answer if Gene Therapy using VIRUSES is a hoax? If it isn't (and they've successfully used gene therapy for a number of diseases like cancer - where the patients/victims DIED!) a hoax then it would seem that viruses exist and have been used as vectors for disease delivery EITHER in 'nature' or as part of Ongoing Project Paperclip.
I have no problem going over this with you line-item because your mind is primed for cause/effect and mechanism of action and materials and methods.
But this is 16-year old information for me and I'm damned tired of getting the class of remedial kids that are drooling on themselves at this BASIC level of understanding becasue I sure as FUCK expected to be light years beyond this with HELP in what I'm trying to do to defeat the Lyme ACTUAL, REAL, EXISTENTIAL THREAT-LEVEL PANFUCKINGDEMIC.
I did get a hoot out of the very first video I tried that it was of isolation from goose crap. I keep telling people I know that what we read online is a lot simpler than we are being told. The truth tellers have to convey that simplicity.
Don’t break your arm patting yourself on the back. There are better ways to “explain” to people and sound more professional. Passing the information you have to the 20% that still have critical thinking capabilities must be done in a certain way.
The mass of humanity respond only to the bullshit posturing of 'confidence'.
I am a goddamned genius and don't give a fuck who I tell that too. Humbleness and fine language didn't get Edgar March Crookshank anywhere when he totally DESTROYED the cult of vaccination with genteel fine words in 1889 and look at the fuck-soup we are in now.
Your notion that I somehow have to pander to small minds that PRETEND to have critical thinking belies ALL OF THE NARCISSISTS out there who take ANY negative comment and rub them on themselves like a dead cat then tells the world not to say that they stink.
If you had the sense god-gave-a-piss ant then you would KNOW that I'm right, we're about to be exteriminated as a life form and people need to Man-Up instead of worrying about how I present
Good thing you aren’t telling me this to my face genius.
You shouldn’t be calling anyone but yourself narcissistic. Maybe I should explain the word - look in a mirror.
If you are such a genius and written so many books why is it your name is not well known?
I agree we are in a spiritual war of Good vs evil and need to “man up” and need solid leaders, but you’re not it. A great leader does not lead by having a narcissistic omnipotent ego.
Where is your track record for leading men? You sound like a spoiled little boy
Lanka was the vanguard that committed the Original Sin of presuming that Congress who COMMISSIONED MERCK TO CREATE A DISEASE FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO CURE (H.I.V.) AND DARPA ARE NOT AND ARE NOT CAPABLE OF MAKING RNA AND DNA INTO POISONOUS WE UPONS.
That can never be let to stand.
In your external link to the Lanka article he CLAIMS to be the DISCOVERER of a free living virus in the ocean. Then he goes on to re-define a virus.
This is the SECOND SIN OF SCIENCE: IMPRECISION IN LANGUAGE.
IF you are going to claim that something is not as it is labeled: THEN MAKE UP YOUR OWN GODDAMNED NEW LABEL!
Judy Wood had to do it when the world trade towers were "dustified".
The Third Strike that renders Everyone OUT! is what I have been repeating since 2008 that you included in your deconstruction. ALL PATHOGENIC BACTERIA HAVE AN ASSOCIATED ***TOXIGENIC*** PHAGE. I've said this for 16 years without a break: We are COATED from head to toe in Tetanus, Diphtheria, Botulina, Strep, Staph, Pertussis, Sam and Ella, and E. Coli, etc. BUT WE ARE NOT DEAD.
This is NOT because bacteria are our friends. It is because they HAVE NOT BEEN INFECTED BY THE PHAGES THAT MAKE THEM TOXIGENIC OR THEY HAVE BEEN CULLED BY PHAGES THAT ARE LYSOGENIC.
Back to the viruses that don't exist. After 16 years: I've had it with idiots.
Wayne. You are a master at Deconstruction. Your critique of methodological cherry picking is valid.
Allow me to derail this entire investigation by saying that the SINGLE FAILURE in the realm of people making claims is that THEY ARE READING OTHER PEOPLE'S LITERATURE then arguing how many pinheads can dance on an angel.
The ESSENCE of the Scientific Method is to have an outside party CONFIRM the CLINICAL EXPERIMENTS and therefore the conclusions of the original Postulate
NOT
act like the FDA that takes the data from the drug company and run spellcheck on it.
Until that FAILURE is eliminated then we frankly, Scarlett, have NOTHING to talk about.
That being said I will continue to comment on your Stack as I finish reading it.
Wayne the last paragraph you posted was an excellent summation for me. I’m going to repost here on Substack and the limited social media platform I have left.
“…Those very real indoor epidemics may all be entirely bacterial pneumonia”
The virus no virus camps have been trying to shoot holes in each others thinking rather than aa you wrote trying to disprove their own theory. The key for me was finding the Spanish flu experiment that was unable to get a healthy person sick via contact with a sick person.
A bacteriophage is an infection of bacteria, not a "virus" per se. As I wrote in my article, "pure viruses have never been seen in a microscope, never validly photographed, never truly isolated and thus not purifiable, and never given to healthy people to prove they cause sickness". The Brogna study is a study of a bacteriophage in human feces. If it is contagious it would only be by fecal-oral route. But you can't prove no virus by using the 1918 Rosenau study because it focused on mucus as an indirect measure, not an isolated virus. The Rosenau study does invalidate contagion however. As I stated in my article, I was trying to play devil's advocate by challenging the no virus position, that I believe in.
Thanks for comment. I am aware there has been no study in history that proved a virus let alone effectiveness. I have not been aware of your website however. You have accumulated a wealth of research.
Has anyone ever questioned in their own mind WHY when you go to a White Coated Assassin that they tell you that you have a 'virus' without doing a cell culture or plaque assay or even the dreaded PCR test (pre-convid) but then write a prescription for an ANTIBIOTIC that ONLY takes the cell wall off of bacteria?
A possible explanation might be an assholian attempt to reduce the population of bacteria that might be infected by phages that are TOGETHER creating the conditions that manifest as disease.
A very simple idea that I came up with years ago but NO ONE has ever addressed it on any level other than to argue the superficial points.
The average person with no experience in things biologique or bio wharf air will never take into account any AND logic only OR logic (a sign of an infantile mind) because they have been trained to accept only dialectical choices. I have posted this Cut & Paste since the convid plandemic was first constructed as an A.I. scripted social engineering project. It is based on Asymmetrical Full-Spectrum Warfare principles that have ALWAYS been used by the other side for at least 5784 years;
#1 Could it be part of the $7.3 Million Fauci spent on Gain of Function Wuhan Weapon? Yes.
#2 Could it be a complete fabrication of fear that then causes people to get medical intervention that kills them? Yes.
#3 Could it be a complete fabrication of fear that uses the fear as a cover to spray 'disinfectants' that have ALL of the same symptoms of
the supposed disease? Yes.
#4 Could it be that the vaccine is the actual disease/weapon? Yes.
#5 Could it be that the vaccine is part of a binary or tertiary weapon deliver system? Yes.
#6 Could it be that a virus or vaccine is activated by frequency such as the 5G system? Yes.
#7 Could it be graphene oxide that is in the swabs, masks, vaccines,chemtrails, etc? Yes.
#8 Could it be graphene oxide coupled with any of the other components as a binary or tertiary weapons system AND activated by frequency? Yes.
My latest meme is ALL OF THE ABOVE.
We don't know the answer to ANY of these questions so if it is bad then I just take it as true.
Give me some more background on why you say that Bacteriophages cannot be isolated from their Bacterial Hosts. Viruses by definition are FILTERABLE ORGANISMS, which means that below a certain micron level the supposed agents will pass through the filter but anything larger cannot pass. Viruses have always been able to be isolated with the only confounding factor that cellular debris and free nucleic acids can also pass the filter.
Since 2008 I have also been sharing the recipe for spontaneous generation of phages using Yeast extract, B-vitamins, Phosphorus, and Casein OUTSIDE OF A HOST CELL. This brings everyting in to the world of Royal Rife and de novo assembly from protits to bacteria to mycobacteria to fungi known as pleomorphism that I could partially confirm with a study by Stanford that has since been sanitized from the internet.
Pat
So you are saying that bacteriophage isolation from their host can be accomplished. So, it must. be deliberate that they are not being isolated when it comes to COVID-19. From what you have shared it sounds like Virus is a distraction and Bacteriophage is the pathogen that could be in a number of different types of hosts. Here is link to video telling how to isolate phages from geese and duck poop at a park. The phages connected with E. Coli can be harvested from animal poop using a 50 ML cone and a spatula. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt0miFrXMaY
WAYNE !
Wayne.... how long did it take you to find that video?
In the age of information it takes SECONDS to have access to ANYTHING that the A.I. will now petulantly allow access to.
SECONDS.
To find what: Visual plaque assay of bacteriophage = VIRUSES WITHOUT THE USE OF AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE.
Harvesting of the plaque = REPLICATED BACTERIOPHAGES = VIRUSES that can then be
ISO-FUCKING-LATED in a 0.22 micron filter that EXCLUDES ALL BACTERIA (she had to centrifuge the supernatant twice just to get the particle size down to where it didn't plug the filter...
AND THEN SHE HAD A SOLUTION OF LYTIC (LYSATE) PHAGES THAT COULD THEN KILL THE HELL OUT OF E. COLI THAT COULD KILL PEOPLE (TOXGENIC PHAGE INFECTED E. Coli).
Phages can be Friend or Foe. Phreind/Phoe.
I've been telling this story since 2008 which is why I have conclude the entire world is under a Black Magicks Mind Control SPELL. BMMCS.
Tell me if you didn't get a chill knowing that she was filtering Goose Shit and the name of your Substack is Goose Sauce ???? !!!!!!
Welcome, My Son: To The Machine.
Lettuce speak of Eye Soul Lay Shun:
in the Olden Days before high tech machinery the ONLY way to deterimine phages was the Plaque Assay and then they would take that pus-like clump of VIRUSES and treat other bacteria of the same species to make sure that it KILLED THEM. Phages were used as MEDICINE until the US decided to make them into We Upons. You can't see a phage under a light microscope. But even back in the days of Looney Louey Pasture they had filters to exclude certain sized particles
======================================
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles › PMC547049
Use of Membrane Filter Technique in the Microbiological Control for the ...
All yeast cells filtered were successfully retained and cultivated on a 1.2-μ membrane filter by use of a synthetic medium. All bacteria filtered avoided entrapment on a 1.2-μ membrane filter and were successfully retained and cultivated on a 0.22-μ membrane filter with the same synthetic medium.
===================================
As you can see this is why the woman in the video you linked STILL USE 0.22 micron filters to this day.
THESE ARE INDUSTRY STANDARDS SO WHEN THE MULING, BARKING, WHINING TALKING HEADS SAY THAT "NO VIRUS HAS EVER BEEN ISOLATED, AND PURIFIED..." that is only PARTIALLY TRUE. ANY SUBSTANCE THAT CAN PASS THE 0.22 micron pore size will get through: Nucleic acids and any shed particles of the bacteria and fungus and parasites that pass through those pores. But it certainly isolates them from the LARGE confunding contenders that the VDE people seem to embrace with open arms as the saviors of mankind: Fungus, Bacteria and Parasites are now the Friends of Mankind. Here to help. Kinda like the Is Ra Elis 'helping' the Pal Us Steinians.
==========================================
https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Northwest_University/MKBN211%3A_Introductory_Microbiology_(Bezuidenhout)/06%3A_Culturing_Microorganisms/6.14%3A_6._14-_Physical_Antimicrobial_Control/6.14.07%3A_Filtration
A typical microfiltration membrane pore size range is 0.1-10 µm, with the most commonly used being 0.2 µm and 0.45 µm, which is sufficient to eliminate bacteria and fungi.
Quite often, when biological samples are processed, viruses must be removed or inactivated. Nanofilters with smaller pore sizes of 20-50 nm (nanofiltration) are used.
Some studies have shown that prions can be removed or reduced by filtration.
=========================================
Nanofilters are a newer edition to the ceramic filters of days gone by. But look at the website:
INTRODUCTORY MICROBIOLOGY !!!!
This is the basics ! yet asshats all day long will vomit clandestine-service scripted talking points like: Never Been Isolated. Never Been Purified.
Even Bernaise and Hit Leer knew that if you repeat it loud enough and long enough it will be taken as fact.
Fuck me with a stick.
I've been going over this for 16 fucking years and I'm tired of emotional idiots out of their depth of BASIC LABORATORY TECHNIQUE.
There are limits to what I know but it seems that if you wanted to reduce confounding variables like free RNA or DNA that you could use either enzymes to degrade them or antibodies to flocculate them.
Seems like there'a a lot of flocculation going on in the background.
******************************************
But do you see what has been going on since the days of D'Herelle in the 1900s.
Tests that used to rely on the EYES = plaque assay and VIRAL CULTURE were REPLACED by bullshit like PCR and 50/50 antibody assays.
ON PURPOSE.
With such USELESS tests you can MAKE the results anything you WANT them to be:
Run the PCR too few cycles = Negative.
Run the PCR too many cycles = Positive.
Run a plaque assay/cell culture and a Third Grader could read the results.
================================
If you're familiar with the series that I did with Our Lady of Sardinia on Cures that are Not Cures we had to go to the basics of DEFINING what Detoxification is and what Cure means.
You and I will have to formalize what a VIRUS is based on the accepted terminology and TAXONOMY is and separate it out from CELLULAR POISONS and insure that everyone knows that a bacteiophage is merely a VIRUS that infects bacteria.
But here's the thing that the fools that are either natural idiots or are clandestine service agents TOTALLY IGNORE:
MANY microbial agents can be husked out and the payload can be replaced by whatever the evil geniuses have concocted. This means that you can take a bacteriophage or... to make things modern and relatable:
A fucking ADENOVIRUS = THE VECTOR FOR ONE TYPE OF THE CONVEED VACK SCENES, HUSKED OUT AND FILLED IN WITH WHATEVER THEY WANTED INSIDE OF IT.
All that has to happen then is for the VEHICLE to adhere to the cell wall of the host (this time HUMANS instead of bacteria) and gain entry to the cell then offload the guts and its off to the races.
THIS IS CALLED GENE THERAPY!
Now, you are obligated to ask and the VDEs are obligated to answer if Gene Therapy using VIRUSES is a hoax? If it isn't (and they've successfully used gene therapy for a number of diseases like cancer - where the patients/victims DIED!) a hoax then it would seem that viruses exist and have been used as vectors for disease delivery EITHER in 'nature' or as part of Ongoing Project Paperclip.
I have no problem going over this with you line-item because your mind is primed for cause/effect and mechanism of action and materials and methods.
But this is 16-year old information for me and I'm damned tired of getting the class of remedial kids that are drooling on themselves at this BASIC level of understanding becasue I sure as FUCK expected to be light years beyond this with HELP in what I'm trying to do to defeat the Lyme ACTUAL, REAL, EXISTENTIAL THREAT-LEVEL PANFUCKINGDEMIC.
Who will rid me of these troublesome VDE Priests!
The last whine of the VDEs is purification.
Here thou goeth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t85C04Ueio
I did get a hoot out of the very first video I tried that it was of isolation from goose crap. I keep telling people I know that what we read online is a lot simpler than we are being told. The truth tellers have to convey that simplicity.
Don’t break your arm patting yourself on the back. There are better ways to “explain” to people and sound more professional. Passing the information you have to the 20% that still have critical thinking capabilities must be done in a certain way.
Good luck
Wrong on all counts.
The mass of humanity respond only to the bullshit posturing of 'confidence'.
I am a goddamned genius and don't give a fuck who I tell that too. Humbleness and fine language didn't get Edgar March Crookshank anywhere when he totally DESTROYED the cult of vaccination with genteel fine words in 1889 and look at the fuck-soup we are in now.
Your notion that I somehow have to pander to small minds that PRETEND to have critical thinking belies ALL OF THE NARCISSISTS out there who take ANY negative comment and rub them on themselves like a dead cat then tells the world not to say that they stink.
If you had the sense god-gave-a-piss ant then you would KNOW that I'm right, we're about to be exteriminated as a life form and people need to Man-Up instead of worrying about how I present
THE TRUTH.
Good thing you aren’t telling me this to my face genius.
You shouldn’t be calling anyone but yourself narcissistic. Maybe I should explain the word - look in a mirror.
If you are such a genius and written so many books why is it your name is not well known?
I agree we are in a spiritual war of Good vs evil and need to “man up” and need solid leaders, but you’re not it. A great leader does not lead by having a narcissistic omnipotent ego.
Where is your track record for leading men? You sound like a spoiled little boy
Lanka was the vanguard that committed the Original Sin of presuming that Congress who COMMISSIONED MERCK TO CREATE A DISEASE FOR WHICH THERE WAS NO CURE (H.I.V.) AND DARPA ARE NOT AND ARE NOT CAPABLE OF MAKING RNA AND DNA INTO POISONOUS WE UPONS.
That can never be let to stand.
In your external link to the Lanka article he CLAIMS to be the DISCOVERER of a free living virus in the ocean. Then he goes on to re-define a virus.
This is the SECOND SIN OF SCIENCE: IMPRECISION IN LANGUAGE.
IF you are going to claim that something is not as it is labeled: THEN MAKE UP YOUR OWN GODDAMNED NEW LABEL!
Judy Wood had to do it when the world trade towers were "dustified".
The Third Strike that renders Everyone OUT! is what I have been repeating since 2008 that you included in your deconstruction. ALL PATHOGENIC BACTERIA HAVE AN ASSOCIATED ***TOXIGENIC*** PHAGE. I've said this for 16 years without a break: We are COATED from head to toe in Tetanus, Diphtheria, Botulina, Strep, Staph, Pertussis, Sam and Ella, and E. Coli, etc. BUT WE ARE NOT DEAD.
This is NOT because bacteria are our friends. It is because they HAVE NOT BEEN INFECTED BY THE PHAGES THAT MAKE THEM TOXIGENIC OR THEY HAVE BEEN CULLED BY PHAGES THAT ARE LYSOGENIC.
Back to the viruses that don't exist. After 16 years: I've had it with idiots.
Wayne. You are a master at Deconstruction. Your critique of methodological cherry picking is valid.
Allow me to derail this entire investigation by saying that the SINGLE FAILURE in the realm of people making claims is that THEY ARE READING OTHER PEOPLE'S LITERATURE then arguing how many pinheads can dance on an angel.
The ESSENCE of the Scientific Method is to have an outside party CONFIRM the CLINICAL EXPERIMENTS and therefore the conclusions of the original Postulate
NOT
act like the FDA that takes the data from the drug company and run spellcheck on it.
Until that FAILURE is eliminated then we frankly, Scarlett, have NOTHING to talk about.
That being said I will continue to comment on your Stack as I finish reading it.
Wayne the last paragraph you posted was an excellent summation for me. I’m going to repost here on Substack and the limited social media platform I have left.
“…Those very real indoor epidemics may all be entirely bacterial pneumonia”
The virus no virus camps have been trying to shoot holes in each others thinking rather than aa you wrote trying to disprove their own theory. The key for me was finding the Spanish flu experiment that was unable to get a healthy person sick via contact with a sick person.
Thanks for your informative posting.
dpl is a great website. I rarely say that about websites.
A bacteriophage is an infection of bacteria, not a "virus" per se. As I wrote in my article, "pure viruses have never been seen in a microscope, never validly photographed, never truly isolated and thus not purifiable, and never given to healthy people to prove they cause sickness". The Brogna study is a study of a bacteriophage in human feces. If it is contagious it would only be by fecal-oral route. But you can't prove no virus by using the 1918 Rosenau study because it focused on mucus as an indirect measure, not an isolated virus. The Rosenau study does invalidate contagion however. As I stated in my article, I was trying to play devil's advocate by challenging the no virus position, that I believe in.
Thanks for comment. I am aware there has been no study in history that proved a virus let alone effectiveness. I have not been aware of your website however. You have accumulated a wealth of research.