The Ongoing Dupery About (Non-Existent) Graphene in Vaccines Unwittingly Spread by Vaccine Truthers

“There is no graphene. It’s one ideological and propaganda chimera, and all that exists are thin layers of graphite, passed off as graphene”. - Stefano Scoglio, PhD, co-author of Virus Mania

According to Medline Plus Medical Encyclopedia, “Graphite (not Graphene) is relatively non-poisonous. There may be no symptoms”. The Illinois Poison Center says: “If your child ate pencil lead, they are unlikely to experience symptoms”.  A study reported in PubMed.com stated: “The nanoparticles (of graphene and graphite) had no toxic effects on blood parameters and growth of rats, suggesting their potential applicability as remedies or in drug delivery systems”.  Graphite has radiation shielding properties from radio waves, x-ray, microwave and UV (source Everything You Need to Know About Graphene Shielding, Nanografi). But, Graphene, not Graphite, would be so frail it would be pulverized by electro-magnetic signals (Scoglio). 

The Rumble and Bitchute video sharing platforms are the main targets of a story about hacking human brains with vaccine implantation of “Neural Dust” made from graphene injected into patients and triggered by 5-G cellular telephone microwaves. The newest twist on this story is wireless signals to graphene implants can even induce Coronavirus.  According to Stefano Scoglio, PhD, Italy, this story is a diversion from the more important story that mRNA and synthetic lipids (PEG-antifreeze) and spike protein are some of “the most toxic substances on the planet” but are unable to enter human cells because of rejection by the immune system as shown in a joint study by Pfizer and Japan.  Calling pseudo science’s bluff, Scoglio shows there is no such thing as graphene. Graphite, the real material passed off as graphene, is benign or beneficial – see above.

Stefan Scoglio is an Italian microbiologist with a PhD in philosophy, MSc microbiology, BSc physics, and was nominated for the Nobel Prize for medicine. He is a co-author of the books Virus Mania (2001), author of Apandemia (Italian “no pandemic” - 2023) and 25 peer-reviewed research papers on toxicology.   Scoglio’s 20-page research paper “There Is No Graphene” can be found at the Chiron Return website.  A 5-page digest of his paper is posted at the Machiavelli Man Substack page. 

Many people have fallen for the graphene dupery because of the assumed credibility associated with the 2010 Nobel Prize for science which supposedly discovered the properties of “two-dimensional graphene” that cannot exist in the real three-dimensional world (Scoglio). 

Scoglio’s offers the following evidence to support his thesis there is no graphene:

1.     Graphene is defined as 1-atom layer thick, but this means it is invisible in even electron microscopes and is too small to be seen by the naked eye. If it nonetheless safely exists in cosmetics and foods, how do we know it is not graphite the parent material for graphene?

2.     La Quinta Columna (The Fifth Column, Spain), a well-funded purported citizen’s research group, released videos in 2021 of a vague, dark substance in blood they claim was graphene. Columna analyzed the purported graphene by only questionable indirect light spectrum analysis. This method must be dismissed because, suspiciously, Columna never performed a simple chemical analysis. Moreover, the technique of extracting a 1-atom layer of graphene by peeling it from graphite using Scotch tape is obviously crude and unscientific. The purported honeycomb structure of graphene can be degraded by manufacturing, microscope analysis and by electric energy waves. Whatever Columna reported as graphene could only have been at best a false positive.

3.     Quinta Columna contradicts itself defining Graphene as 1-atom thick (which is invisible) and then also arbitrarily as at least 10-atoms thick, which they call Graphite.  Think of a 1-millimeter pencil lead cut into 1 million slices, then incredibly and impossibly cut into 10,000 smaller slices to get Graphene (Scoglio). If graphene is visible, it is not graphene and would lose its purported electromagnetic communication capability. 

4.     Scoglio points out that Columna omitted that if it was graphene, the Innate Immune system would have exploded any graphene entering cells and scattered the tiny residues to organs all over the body, which would work to quarantine them.

5.     Graphene sheets can be purchased online in the market but only in multiple layers or as a composite with aluminum and titanium in minimum 35-atom thick layers (see Techinstro.com, Graphene Sheet).  So, even the market sells only graphite mis-advertised as graphene.

Scoglio says graphene is “one ideological and propaganda chimera, and all that exists are thin layers of graphite, passed off as graphene”.  “By moving (viruses, graphene and self-assembling nanobots) into the invisibility field nobody can check it out and thus cannot be proven. They just say it exists and has divine-like powers over you to get you to live in fear of your life so they can get you to do what they want”, says Scoglio. He further states that even industrial magnate Elon Musk says “nanotech” is “100% synonymous with B.S.”

It is difficult to recognize whether video websites propagating the graphene mind control and remote triggering of coronavirus stories are “controlled opposition” or not, given that effective propaganda mixes enough fact and fear into their stories to be believable.  Any expensively staged videos purporting to show microscope slide photos of graphene in human blood are bogus because graphene would be invisible and would have to be animation says Scoglio.  Another credibility test would be to ask why the medical personnel shown on “vaccine truther” websites are not charged by state medical boards for disseminating negative information about graphene in vaccines?

This presents a sort of double bind (cognitive dissonance) for Vaccine Truthers who have a legitimate suspicion that vaccines are dangerous and thus are prone to believing the purported dangerous attributes of graphene to control the mind and trigger coronavirus. But this sets Vaccine Truthers up for dupery and becoming unwitting spreaders of fear while they may be sincere in believing they are exposing vaccine truth. Graphene in vaccines is not science but ideology. Vaccine Truthers are not necessarily lying because “liars know they are lying, but the ideologist does not” (sociologist Peter Berger).  Vaccine Truthers don’t want to hear that biotech has never found a way to get anything toxic into human cells without the immune system blasting it to bits because they want to save people from taking vaccines altogether (Scoglio, Salisbury).

The public may now be more aware that COVID-19 was not a lab leak of a bioweapon nor transmission of a “virus” from a bat to humans, but a fraud.  With this raised consciousness, perhaps they can also see graphene is the next dupery surrounding COVID.  Virus and graphene dupery is endless.

---

ADDENDUM - 5 PAGE SYNOPSIS OF 20 PAGE “THERE IS NO GRAPHENE” BY ANTONIO SCOGLIO, PHD

Graphene Does Not Exist – Condensed by Wayne Lusvardi (edits for clarity in parentheses)

Stefano Scoglio, PhD, MSc. microbiology, BSc Physics, 7 medical patents, nominated for Nobel Prize in medicine, co-author Virus Mania, 2021, author of Apandemia (Italian – 2023)

https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/ca565124-45ac-4f27-8ca9-bc3b2a8982ed#details

The presumed evidence of graphene’s presence in the COVID-19 serums is completely unfounded.

Graphene is part of the so-called “nanotechnologies” (miniaturized electro-mechanical instruments) of the Fourth Industrial Revolution that Klaus Schwab has placed at the center of the Great Reset’s totalitarian and tyrannical project.

If the “occult bankers” were to succeed in generating the *smart dust* to be injected into everyone on the planet control of the masses would be complete (‘smart dust’ is a buzz word concocted by electrical engineer Kristopher Pister at U. California to describe an array of wireless sensors or tiny thermostats. (The term is borrowed from Walt Disney’s 1953 movie ‘Peter Pan’ where the fictional character Tinker Bell uses fairy dust which has magical powers). Could it be that attributing to a group of bankers who go by the name of “Davos Club” almost supernatural powers, which are really impossible, we feed into a mythology of power that ends up making us feel helpless and at the mercy of forces that act, literally, in the kingdom of the invisible?

Graphene, like smart dust, draws much of its power and charm precisely due to its invisibility – as happens with all virological mythology.  Promoting alleged invisible forces has many advantages, not the least of which is impossible direct verification.  Modern nanoscience has ‘overcome’ (vanquished) the principle of falsifiability placed at the center of the scientific method. 

Graphene has the same relevance as the smart dust issue. To reject the mythological existence of graphene involves the collapse of the mythology of nanotechnology and *smart dust* -- (used to get suspicious people to focus on graphene in vaccines as a form of *smart dust* than on the highly toxic mRNA). 

The Issue of Graphene in Vaccines

The more-known promoters of the theory of graphene in vaccines is the La Quinta Columna in Spain (The Fifth Column) who claim to have seen graphene in blood of the vaccinated through dark field microscopy (which creates a dark background around tiny foreground substances not visible to the naked eye to be able to see them).  This method must be dismissed because it is completely subjective. Without any biochemical analysis, one cannot say for sure whether it is graphene, graphite or any other substance (like pyrolytic carbon).

The only study of some scientific validity is Quinta Columna’s, yet we are about to see how easily it can be falsified.

Seven COVID vaccines were analyzed by Quinta Columna using spectroscopic “micro-Raman methodology” (under this technology a substance is never seen but its light spectrum can indirectly be apprehended, like seeing a shadow or a rainbow or a sunset instead of the sun or a full moon reflecting sunlight).  Under this light spectrum analysis only two dimensions can be seen but real living things are all three dimensional.  Four samples were taken from each vax and deposited on glass slides and dried.  A distinction must be made between graphene and graphite (found in pencil lead).  There is no difference as to their chemical composition only to their size and shape measured by the thickness or thinness of a slice of the material.  What is often passed off as graphene is thus nothing but graphite. (Note: The B-2 stealth bomber air frame is made of a composite of graphite, epoxy, titanium, and aluminum alloys, not graphene). 

Quinta Columna selected two types of material to look at: one so thin as to be transparent and the other thicker material so opaque as to resemble charcoal. 

Graphene – one atom thick, invisible even to electron microscopes (maximum thinness)

Graphite – nine atoms thick, black opaque to electron microscopes (10 x thicker)

But you can’t have it both ways (If you can see invisible graphene in a microscope, it is not graphene). A proper study should have limited the study to translucent objects.  Quinta Columna eliminated the transparent thin Graphene for analysis. Graphene can neither be confirmed nor denied because it is too thin and only two-dimensional in a microscope. (But in the real world all objects are three dimensional, also having depth). All that remains to be analyzed is Graphite, not Graphene.  Even at ten atoms thick Graphite is an infinitesimal thickness.  But categorizing the same material as Graphene or Graphite is completely arbitrary. It is so arbitrary, that Quinta Columna contradicts itself by redefining 10-atom thick Graphite as 1-atom thick Graphene.   

Quinta Columna contradicts itself by saying Graphene is incredibly thin but says that if it is ultra-thin it must be Graphite. Quinta Columna then proceeds to say Graphene can be affirmed “with certainty”; then proceeds to say it is a “high probability”. But what Quinta Columna considers “high probability” is on 8 out of 110 objects studied (7.3%), meaning only 4 of 7 vaccine vials had graphene, but only in (scattered) fragments which is physically impossible. The only possible explanation is that the presence of the alleged graphene, as detected by the micro-Raman light spectrum technique, is simply false positive.

Frankly, the question is: is it possible that Quinta Columna...to lead people to believe in the terrible danger of graphene, that would give occult powers the ability to control you or kill you at a distance, on such unscientific and clearly manipulated grounds?

The Question of the Existence of Graphene

Even if there is no proof of the existence of graphene in the vaccines, and if there is no need for graphene to explain hyper-toxicity of these COVID vaccines, given the extreme toxicity of synthetic mRNA and synthetic lipid (fat) particles declared contained in them, is it possible at least to reasonably accept that graphene exists and is widely used (in cosmetics and foods)?  As I am about to show, graphene is one ideological and propaganda chimera, and all that exists are thin layers of graphite, passed off as graphene.

Graphene is supposed to have been concretely isolated in 2004…as a ‘single layer of carbon atoms’.  Even if until then it was thought impossible that such a single carbon layer could exist, the authors claimed to have succeeded in overcoming these challenges…down to a single atomic layer called graphene.

Herein lies another discrepancy: the thin sheets are still defined “of graphite”, so it is unclear at what point graphite becomes graphene…..

First a philosophical note: It seems self-evident that in a three-dimensional world such as ours, there cannot be two-dimensional realities…..two dimensional living cards exist in Alice in Wonderland.  When science begins to work with metaphors, and with Alice in Wonderland patterns, better pay attention of the possible hidden fraud!

Here the authors clarify that the material can be considered graphene at below 10 atomic layers; anything above that, and it is graphite – thus losing all the great alleged electronic transmission advantages of graphene….To figure out how big a nanometer is: It’s a millionth part of a millimeter…..So, the maximum thickness of graphene is 0.09 nanometers, which is less than 1 nanometer (a pencil lead is a millimeter and that would have to be divided up 1 million times and then another 10,000 times to get a nanometer).

The problem is the human eye…can distinguish sizes and thicknesses no less than 100,000 times a nanometer, which is basically 1/10^th of a millimeter. So, what is defined as graphene, is by its very nature invisible to us; and even to any optical microscope, whose maximum resolution is 0.3 micrometers…over 300 times the size of graphene. 

The only microscope that could “see” the graphene would be the TEM (Transmission Electron Microscope or TransScope)…But even admitting that the TEM actually works, one would still have to work with invisible material, which would be difficult, if not impossible, in practice. But the reality is even dimmer: because TEM (TransScope) has enormous problems with ‘graphene’. 

….’to see’ is a really a misnomer, because in actuality the electron microscope absorbs the metallic resistance of the material…and then transforms them, through a specific software design, into images…admitted by the researchers….(What) we see…(is a) honeycomb structure….we can see how almost half of the presumed highlighted atoms (the white ones) have lost their original hexagonal structure, becoming pentagonal, heptagonal, or distorted.

But it’s not only the electric beam that damages the structure of the alleged graphene…the method of production…as well as the process of oxidation…..causes damage…So can we really talk about graphene? Graphene is supposed to be the absolutely hardest…material, 40 times harder than…a diamond, practically an indestructible substance! Instead, (it) degrades very easily under electrical impulses or redox (oxidation) processes, and therefore seems to possess the very fragility that characterizes graphite (think pencil lead).

So, now we have established that using TEM (TransScope)...that could make graphene visible…is not suitable to adequately analyze graphene without destroying it….this very methodology reveals how the material is defined as super-strong graphene but is nothing but graphite…

The technique (of getting a one-atom layer thick layer of graphene) by peeling it with Scotch tape appears very rudimentary (and inexact)…since not even TEM (TransScope) as a checking instrument was used, the determination of the flakes’ subtlety (measurable precision) must be done by the naked eye, which means….the (graphene) flakes…are by their very nature, graphite, not graphene…as acknowledged by the authors.

But even if the measurement (was) 3 nanometers – this thickness would already contain more than 30 layers of graphene, and therefore…would be normal graphite….That it was graphite is also made clear by the fact that such sheets (of graphene) ‘were visible to the naked eye’, which means they had a thickness of 100 micrometers equal to 100,000 atomic layers! 

The (present images) speak to this intrinsic contradiction, which is asserted with no embarrassment, and with the manifest awareness of wanting to pass as graphene what they themselves know to be graphite.

…the graphene business is based on peddling normal graphite as graphene…Here too, it is repeated that graphene --- one of the thinnest materials in the world – is a plane of carbon atoms, one atom thick, organized in a hexagonal lattice structure (the inventors were awarded the Nobel Prize for this trick)…and…specifies that the graphene sheet that sells is 35 micrometers thick!!

It is a thickness vastly greater than an atom.  (Even this) would be hardly visible suggesting the real thickness is much higher…but it should contain 350,000 atomic layers of carbon. Can you imagine? A tiny, almost invisible fraction of a millimeter, a millionth of a millimeter, which contains 350,000 layers! Difficult to believe…

And (any) excuse…does not hold, because…when the overlapping layers exceeds 9, we are no longer talking of graphene, but only of graphite.

Therefore, it is confirmed that – both in research and in the market – what is merely graphite is continuously passed off as graphene.

….how can it be graphene, in theory the hardest of all known materials, if it breaks and distorts beyond repair under the electric-electronic beam of the microscope, or in a normal oxidation-reduction process?

In other words, graphene not only doesn’t exist because it can be neither produced nor isolated under normal conditions, but because also under experimental and laboratory conditions – such as with TEM (TransScope) – science has shown that it does not possess the amazing characteristics that theoretically distinguish it, such as extreme hardness and resistance.

In conclusion, apply a little common sense to understand that graphene is an impossible material, a merely mythological and para-magical substance, which, in concrete reality, is graphite by another name.  End