Wuhan Lab Leak Virus Gene Sequence Unable to be Reproduced - Ergo Suspected Fraud
THE GENE SEQUENCE 'LEAKED' IN WUHAN FROM A COMPUTER NOT A LAB
Controlled opposition is providing an illusion of choice that diverts attention from some unpopular government action.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin, Chairman of the Commissars of the Soviet
Union
“There are two main theories of COVID-19 origin: One is that it jumped naturally from wildlife to people. The other is that the virus was under study in a lab, from which it escaped. The clues point in a specific direction – a lab leak. It’s important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory”. – Nicolas Wade, New York Times, Factcheck.org, The Wuhan Lab and the Gain of Function Disagreement, May 2021.
Synopsis: The two theories of the origin of COVID-19 are false arguments (false dialectic) between two socially engineered options to divert attention from the reality of fraud by implied organized crime. The computerized genetic sequence for the bugaboo COVID-19 virus has not been able to be reproduced by the Cowan Virus Research Group using the same software employed by Dr. Fan Wu PhD of the Wuhan Lab. Nor was there any control group analysis to compare the bugaboo virus in sick and the healthy groups or to crosscheck for other diseases, such as strep pneumonia lung cancer, or cardiac shock. Therefore, the Wuhan Lab Leak theory is entirely disproven leaving the only other cause being the Wuhan Lab genetic virus research was manually manipulated – revealing plausible fraud. This also casts doubt on the Wuhan Lab Leak and Bio-Weapon Theory of journalists, doctors and researchers of the Health Freedom Movement, none of whom called for genetic data replication or control groups for the last three years - Summary of Tom Cowan, MD, “Discussing the Actual Origin of the Lab Leak Hypothesis”, Oct. 18, 2023.
The infamous Wuhan Lab Leak in China originated in early 2020 by taking a bronchial mucous sample from a 41-year-old male patient with pneumonia symptoms who purportedly tested negative for bacterial, fungal or viral infection from lung disease, cardiac shock or liver infection that may have spread to the lung. Instead of merely treating the symptoms, the Wuhan Lab proceeded to have the mucous sample genetically sequenced to determine if a novel virus was the cause, as 1,975 similar undiagnosable pneumonia cases had supposedly mounted up in China. The Wuhan Lab found the genetic sequence of a novel virus called COVID-19 and “the rest is history” of the pandemic. Subsequently, the world was divided into two ideological camps by mass media that COVID-19 was from animal-to-human transmission from a bat or from a lab leak of a natural or man-made virus from the Wuhan Lab.
More than three years later no one has called for trying to replicate the Wuhan Lab genetic sequencing or to conduct control group studies to validate the genetic test by exposing sick and healthy people to the suspected viral infection or to determine if the root cause was strep pneumonia, lung cancer, or something else.
A grass-roots research group of doctors and researchers known as the Cowan Group led by Tom Cowan, MD, retained two genetic researchers at their own expense using the same Megahit software used by the Wuhan Lab, to replicate the original online raw data gene sequence. Reproduction and control groups are the gold standard of scientific research. The result was no matching sequence could be found from the raw data provided by Chinese researcher Fan Wu in his original paper “A New Coronavirus Associated with Human Respiratory Disease in China”, Nature Journal, February 2020. This raises a question of criminal fraud in the origin of the virus and the complicity of China in a coverup.
Cowan has recently released a podcast about his research team’s findings (see Cowans online video “Discussing the Actual Origin of the Lab Leak Theory Webinar”
Cowan points out that if the Wuhan Lab had used the other reputable genetic sequencing software program called “Trinity”, which they considered but rejected, the outcome would have been totally different and there never would have been a pandemic. There would have been no fear of a scary, novel virus supposedly never seen before. The Wuhan Lab genetic study was manipulated to find a potentially threatening virus without any known treatment at that time.
Cowan says the most plausible explanation is that the Wuhan Lab genome was “made up”. Thus, the supposed Lab Leak was never a leak of a real world “virus” pathogen because the so-called virus only existed in a computer, just as Climate Change Theory does. The so-called lab leak was of something that did not exist in the real world and was “leaked” from a computer not from a lab.
Cowan especially calls out those in the so-called “Vaccine Freedom Movement” as being negligent in responding to his group’s call for replication of the original Wuhan Lab research and conducting control group studies. Cowan says his research groups’ findings negate Wuhan Lab Leak proponents connected with the Health Freedom Movement such as:
Steve Kirsch, Entrepreneur – “lab leak” (“lab leak is a real leak”) (skirsch.io website)
Del Bigtree – Journalist, “man-made virus”, “cases came from lab leak” (Highwire website funded by foundations)
Hammond – “lab leak” (unidentified person)
Robert Malone, PhD – mRNA researcher, “man-made, accidentally leaked”
Dr. Joseph Mercola, DO – “a bioweapon”.
Cowan insinuates that the Lab Leak Theory is a false dialectic, and the Health Freedom Movement is controlled opposition that has covered up fraudulent research. Moreover, if the original COVID “virus” was not a real world pathogen, then the statistics of excessive deaths in 2020 attributed to COVID are also fraudulent, which may explain why CDC statistics reported deaths from the flu were practically zero in 2020. The Lab Leak story is a parable of how fraud has massive government and foundation support and funding and mass media coverage, and phony expertise willing to sell its soul, while truth is underfunded, marginalized and subject to shadow banning and censure in a world wide medical tyranny.