Endotoxin behind the mortality of Black Death and 1918 Flu pandemics https://raypeatforum.com/community/threads/endotoxin-behind-the-mortality-of-black-death-and-1918-flu-pandemics.39384/ As many of my readers know, many/most people dying from COVID-19 develop either sepsis and/or respiratory failure. Endotoxin (LPS) is now a known cause behind both of these conditions, as a virus by itself has no known mechanism of causing a cytokine storm. As much as I revile the term "scientific consensus", in this case it seems to be on the right path by stating that activation of the TLR4 (endotoxin) receptor is required in order to bring about a cytokine storm, and, subsequently, multi-organ failure. AFAIK, no virus has ever been demonstrated to activate TLR4 directly. Since most of patients with severe viral disease do NOT present with co-existing bacterial infection, the only explanation for the induction of that cytokine storm is endotoxin (LPS) absorption from the intestine due to severely compromised gut barrier as a result of stress, high cortisol/estrogen, inflammation, etc. As many of my readers know, over the last 4-5 years there have been multiple large human studies demonstrating highly therapeutic effect on bacterial sepsis of vitamin C + vitamin B1 combination. In fact, several large hospitals around the world have started to adopt this protocol as standard treatment even for patients who are just being admitted and have a risk of developing sepsis but have not developed one yet. Coincidentally, several smaller human trials have demonstrated robust benefit of the same protocol against the cytokine storm seen in severe COVID-19. Since the protocol seems to work against both bacterial and viral conditions, the question arises as to what is the common thing between the two. In one word - endotoxin - and the article below states that the same endotoxin-driven cytokine storm is now thought to have been the cause of the high mortality seen in two other world-changing pandemics (one viral and one bacterial) - the 1918 "Spanish" Flu and the Black Death (plague) in the Middle Ages. As such, it is not the pathogen that is likely biggest threat, but rather poor systemic health (e.g. leaky gut), inflammation driven by PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids like canola, flax and sunflower oils), and high endotoxin (LPS lipopolysaccharide - fat wrapped sugar molecule) load.
If you were to read a history book from the 17th century there would have been no plague or Black Death as we know it. It is a strand woven into the narrative by our controllers in the 20th century. If you read the primary sources you will realise that
the phenomenon was global
something very odd was happening in the atmosphere that was poisoning people
large swathes of Europe were unscathed by whatever it was
there was a large earthquake in northern Italy in 1348 that affected Venice and the surrounding areas. Venice was the economic heart of Europe at this time. This is the same time when the initial plague supposedly broke out.
the climate became significantly colder starting from the late 1340s bringing large numbers of people south as they migrated from the colder weather in the north. So we had large population displacements
very odd phenomena were reported across the world like parts of animals and other biological matter dropping from the sky
There was never a mention of rats or anything that resembled a 'virus'.
My best guess was that something hit the Earth (asteroid or large meteor) that caused earthquakes etc. However, this must have been more than just an isolated event, as the event itself lasted over years. Coupled with other phenomena such as a rapidly cooling global temperature causing food shortages it isn't difficult to understand why so many people died and why the pattern of death alone across Europe demonstrates it could not have been a 'virus'. Like all of these 'pandemics', they have been used by the ruling classes to enslave the masses.
The French used the fake threat of plague to try and prevent the Royal Navy from trading with the Far East by imposing quarantines and lockdowns in various ports around the Atlantic under their control. Trust me, there is nothing new under the sun if you care to research it.
Why else do you think one of the Illuminati cards depicts 'The Plague'?
Good comment. In America, the Elites wanted to rid its territories of the Indian Tribes. So, they supposedly infected blankets with viruses and gave them to the Indians - a total coverup story. What really happened is they forcefully relocated tribes from land with water resources they could late speculate to make a profit from, to remote areas with little water resources. Then they eliminated their main source of protein - the buffalo. Then waited for a cold winter, and that eliminated many tribal people who got sick from a "plague". Elites have always known how to manipulate plagues and then blame them on nature or some mysterious germ. That is how society works - it works to cover up its malevolence.
Terrain is a much better explanation than germ theory for all those illnesses, and the cytokine storm as a result of endotoxin is an interesting explananation along those lines.
I don't care for either germ or terrain theories. Both are based on assumptions of blaming a germ or the environment rather than ourselves. We are co-creators of our own diseases. Plant foods have 10,000 x more toxins than any industrial pesticide, and half of those are from rodent droppings from industrial food storage. Endotoxins are made from so-called "good bacteria". This is why there are so many food products in grocery stores that say low fat because it is believed that as we age we can't metabolize fat very well and it ends up a metabolite such as lactate or oxalate. The human metabolism and circulatory systems are meant to flow. When they get plugged up seems to be what is called disease. If we keep our elimination-circulation systems working it doesn't seem to matter so much if we get a germ or live in a contaminated environment.
um, I’m pretty sure that the terrain in terrain theory is actually ourselves. It’s always been an elusive metaphor, given that bodies (terrain) walk around on the planet (also terrain). It’s almost like an earthquake, now that I see it written out. I’m reminded of the French “glissement de terrain” for an earthquake, glissement meaning sliding, I guess. Most people haven’t seen The English Patient, which shows sand dune in the Sahara that look like a woman’s body. It should be required viewing for terrain-theory folk.
Yes. But the Terrain Theorists say simply clean the fish tank and all will be well. But nature's clean up crew - Bacteria - can die and shed endotoxins that degrade the intestine leading to insidious Sepsis blood poisoning. So, it is not so neat a dichotomy of Germ vs. Terrain as a beneficial Terrain cleansing agent can turn into a "germ" so to speak. At least that is my limited understanding. A very helpful critical comment for discussion. Thank you.
Germ and Terrain are abstractions. I prefer to talk about what goes on at the organ level. Sepsis is a disease that results in blood poisoning from needle, from antibiotic resistance or from a permeable intestine that allows undigested food into the blood stream. The compromising of the intestine accounts for about 60% of all sepsis deaths as far as I can find. So it is organ failure of the integrity of the intestinal walls, not some metaphorical cleaning up of the fish tank that Terrain Theory focuses on. It is not toxic food or substances that poisons our blood stream, it is health foods. Vitamin C as ascorbic acid when combined with beneficial Aspergillus fungus in the liver makes Oxalate crystals that manifest as kidney stones, breast cancer, Urinary Tract Infection, etc. Terrain Theory connotes their is something toxic in the fish bowl terrain. But what if it is uncontaminated healthy fish food in their liver and intestine that causes fish to die?
If you were to read a history book from the 17th century there would have been no plague or Black Death as we know it. It is a strand woven into the narrative by our controllers in the 20th century. If you read the primary sources you will realise that
the phenomenon was global
something very odd was happening in the atmosphere that was poisoning people
large swathes of Europe were unscathed by whatever it was
there was a large earthquake in northern Italy in 1348 that affected Venice and the surrounding areas. Venice was the economic heart of Europe at this time. This is the same time when the initial plague supposedly broke out.
the climate became significantly colder starting from the late 1340s bringing large numbers of people south as they migrated from the colder weather in the north. So we had large population displacements
very odd phenomena were reported across the world like parts of animals and other biological matter dropping from the sky
There was never a mention of rats or anything that resembled a 'virus'.
My best guess was that something hit the Earth (asteroid or large meteor) that caused earthquakes etc. However, this must have been more than just an isolated event, as the event itself lasted over years. Coupled with other phenomena such as a rapidly cooling global temperature causing food shortages it isn't difficult to understand why so many people died and why the pattern of death alone across Europe demonstrates it could not have been a 'virus'. Like all of these 'pandemics', they have been used by the ruling classes to enslave the masses.
The French used the fake threat of plague to try and prevent the Royal Navy from trading with the Far East by imposing quarantines and lockdowns in various ports around the Atlantic under their control. Trust me, there is nothing new under the sun if you care to research it.
Why else do you think one of the Illuminati cards depicts 'The Plague'?
Good comment. In America, the Elites wanted to rid its territories of the Indian Tribes. So, they supposedly infected blankets with viruses and gave them to the Indians - a total coverup story. What really happened is they forcefully relocated tribes from land with water resources they could late speculate to make a profit from, to remote areas with little water resources. Then they eliminated their main source of protein - the buffalo. Then waited for a cold winter, and that eliminated many tribal people who got sick from a "plague". Elites have always known how to manipulate plagues and then blame them on nature or some mysterious germ. That is how society works - it works to cover up its malevolence.
Terrain is a much better explanation than germ theory for all those illnesses, and the cytokine storm as a result of endotoxin is an interesting explananation along those lines.
I don't care for either germ or terrain theories. Both are based on assumptions of blaming a germ or the environment rather than ourselves. We are co-creators of our own diseases. Plant foods have 10,000 x more toxins than any industrial pesticide, and half of those are from rodent droppings from industrial food storage. Endotoxins are made from so-called "good bacteria". This is why there are so many food products in grocery stores that say low fat because it is believed that as we age we can't metabolize fat very well and it ends up a metabolite such as lactate or oxalate. The human metabolism and circulatory systems are meant to flow. When they get plugged up seems to be what is called disease. If we keep our elimination-circulation systems working it doesn't seem to matter so much if we get a germ or live in a contaminated environment.
um, I’m pretty sure that the terrain in terrain theory is actually ourselves. It’s always been an elusive metaphor, given that bodies (terrain) walk around on the planet (also terrain). It’s almost like an earthquake, now that I see it written out. I’m reminded of the French “glissement de terrain” for an earthquake, glissement meaning sliding, I guess. Most people haven’t seen The English Patient, which shows sand dune in the Sahara that look like a woman’s body. It should be required viewing for terrain-theory folk.
Yes. But the Terrain Theorists say simply clean the fish tank and all will be well. But nature's clean up crew - Bacteria - can die and shed endotoxins that degrade the intestine leading to insidious Sepsis blood poisoning. So, it is not so neat a dichotomy of Germ vs. Terrain as a beneficial Terrain cleansing agent can turn into a "germ" so to speak. At least that is my limited understanding. A very helpful critical comment for discussion. Thank you.
I include myself as the most important part of the terrain...
Germ and Terrain are abstractions. I prefer to talk about what goes on at the organ level. Sepsis is a disease that results in blood poisoning from needle, from antibiotic resistance or from a permeable intestine that allows undigested food into the blood stream. The compromising of the intestine accounts for about 60% of all sepsis deaths as far as I can find. So it is organ failure of the integrity of the intestinal walls, not some metaphorical cleaning up of the fish tank that Terrain Theory focuses on. It is not toxic food or substances that poisons our blood stream, it is health foods. Vitamin C as ascorbic acid when combined with beneficial Aspergillus fungus in the liver makes Oxalate crystals that manifest as kidney stones, breast cancer, Urinary Tract Infection, etc. Terrain Theory connotes their is something toxic in the fish bowl terrain. But what if it is uncontaminated healthy fish food in their liver and intestine that causes fish to die?